Serum elastase-1 predicts malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: The indication for surgical resection of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) is defined by imaging features, such as mural nodules. Although carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 was selected as a parameter for worrisome features, no serum biomarkers were considered when deciding on surgical indications in the latest international consensus guideline. In this study, we assessed whether clinical factors, imaging findings, and serum biomarkers are useful in predicting malignant IPMNs. METHODS: A total of 234 resected IPMN cases in Chiba University Hospital from July 2005 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 234 patients with resected IPMNs diagnosed by preoperative imaging, 117 were diagnosed with malignant pathologies (high-grade dysplasia and invasive IPMNs) according to the histological classification. In the multivariate analysis, cyst diameter ≥30 mm; p = 0.035), enhancing mural nodules on multidetector computed tomography (≥5 mm; p = 0.018), and high serum elastase-1 (≥230 ng/dl; p = 0.0007) were identified as independent malignant predictors, while CA19-9 was not. Furthermore, based on the receiver operator characteristic curve analyses, elastase-1 was superior to CA19-9 for predicting malignant IPMNs. Additionally, high serum elastase-1 levels (≥230 ng/dl; p = 0.0093) were identified as independent predictors of malignant IPMNs in patients without mural nodules on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The serum elastase-1 level was found to be a potentially useful biomarker for predicting malignant IPMNs.

Clinical benefits of pulmonary resection for lung metastases from pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Systemic chemotherapy is generally used for metastatic pancreatic cancer; however, pulmonary resection may be a treatment option for lung oligometastases from pancreatic cancer. The current study aimed to clarify the oncological outcomes and clinical benefits of pulmonary resection for lung metastases. METHODS: Of 510 patients who underwent pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer, 44 patients with recurrence of isolated lung metastases and one patient with simultaneous lung metastases were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients, 20 patients were selected as candidates for pulmonary resection based on clinical factors such as recurrence-free interval (RFI) from pancreatectomy to lung metastases, number of lung metastases, and serum CA19-9 level. The post-recurrent survival of patients with pulmonary resection was significantly better than that of patients without pulmonary resection. Fourteen of the 20 patients with pulmonary resection developed tumor recurrence with a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 15 months. Univariate analyses revealed that an RFI from pancreatectomy to lung metastases of ≥28 months was associated with better DFS after pulmonary resection. Of the 14 patients with an RFI of ≥28 months, pulmonary resection resulted in prolonged chemotherapy-free interval in 12 patients. Furthermore, repeat pulmonary resection for recurrent tumors after pulmonary resection led to further cancer-free interval in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although many patients had tumor recurrence after pulmonary resection, pulmonary resection for lung metastases from pancreatic cancer may provide prolonged cancer-free interval without the need for chemotherapy. Pulmonary resection should be performed for the patients with a long RFI from pancreatectomy to lung metastases.

Surveillance after resection of non-invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The ideal surveillance strategy after partial pancreatectomy for non-invasive IPMN remains undefined and existing guidelines provide conflicting recommendations. The present study was developed in anticipation of the joint meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) held in Kyoto in July 2022. METHODS: An international team of experts developed the four clinical questions (CQ) to operationalize issues pertaining to surveillance of patients in this context. A systematic review was designed following the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. The search strategy was executed in PubMed/Medline (Ovid), Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. Four investigators individually extracted data from the selected studies and drafted recommendations for each CQ. These were subsequently discussed and agreed upon that the IAP/JPS meeting. RESULTS: From a total of 1098 studies identified through the initial search, 41 studies were included in the review and informed the recommendations. No studies providing level one data were identified in this systematic review, all studies included were cohort or case-control studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of level 1 data addressing the issue of surveillance of patients following partial pancreatectomy for non-invasive IPMN. The definition of remnant pancreatic lesion in this setting is largely heterogeneous across all studies evaluated. Herein we propose an inclusive definition of remnant pancreatic lesions to guide future prospective efforts for reporting the natural history and long-term outcomes of these patients.

[Intraoperative Blood Flow Assessment of Gastric Tube Using Indocyanine Green fluorography during Pancreaticoduodenectomy Following Esophagectomy-Case Reports].

Case 1: A 73-year-old male, who had an intraductal papillary mucinous adenocarcinoma or resectable pancreatic cancer at the uncinate process of the pancreas five years after subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, underwent pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy(PPPD). Case 2: A 68-year-old male, who also had a resectable pancreatic cancer at the uncinate process of the pancreas 3 years after subtotal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, underwent PPPD following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In both cases, right gastroepiploic artery and vein were preserved to maintain the perfusion of the gastric tube during surgery. Indocyanine Green(ICG)fluorography was performed just before duodenal-jejunal anastomosis, which visually showed the well-perfused gastric tube. Both patients had no necrosis of the gastric tube, nor gastrointestinal obstruction after surgery. Intraoperative ICG fluorography was useful to evaluate the blood flow of the remaining gastric tube visually during PPPD for post-esophagectomy patients.

[Conversion Surgery Following Systemic Chemotherapy for Advanced Gallbladder Cancer with Peritoneal Dissemination-A Case Report].

A 73-year-old female was diagnosed with gallbladder cancer, but the future liver remnant volume was deemed insufficient for curative resection. Consequently, transileocolic portal vein embolization was performed. During laparotomy, multiple nodules were palpable on the peritoneal surface of the pelvic floor. Subsequently, staging laparoscopy confirmed the pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in the resected nodules, indicating peritoneal dissemination of gall bladder cancer. Due to this peritoneal dissemination, surgical resection was deemed inappropriate, and the patient was initiated on systemic chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine and cisplatin. Following 22 courses of chemotherapy, contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated no significant changes in the size of the primary tumor or its location relative to the main vessels, although a small metastatic lesion was identified in the gallbladder bed. At the second staging laparoscopy, any nodules suggesting peritoneal dissemination were observed. Based on these findings, we decided to perform curative resection. The surgical procedure involved right hepatectomy plus segment 4a resection, extrahepatic bile duct resection, and hepaticojejunostomy. Pathological examination revealed ypT3bN0M1(HEP), ypStage ⅣB, with the achievement of R0 resection. The patient survived with no recurrences for 40 months after surgery. These results suggest that aggressive therapeutic strategies, including conversion surgery following systemic chemotherapy, may be beneficial for patients initially deemed unresectable due to gallbladder cancer.

[Retrospective Study of Preoperative Serial Pancreatic Juice Aspiration Cytological Examination(SPACE)for Early Preoperative Detection of Pancreatic Cancer].

Serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytological examination(SPACE)has been reported as a reliable preoperative diagnostic method for early pancreatic cancer, when combined with imaging findings suspecting early pancreatic cancer. Among 259 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatic resection at our hospital, SPACE was preoperatively performed in 14 cases(5.4%). Of these 14 cases, final pathological diagnosis was pancreatic cancer in 12 patients (86%), including 5 patients with Stage ⅠA pancreatic cancer(35.7%), all of whom had a mass on preoperative CT or EUS. On the other hand, in the other 2 cases(14.3%), CT/EUS detected no mass but focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy and main pancreatic duct stenosis which were the imaging findings suspecting very early pancreatic cancer such as cancer in situ. Although preoperative SPACE results of these 2 cases were class Ⅳ, final pathological results of resected specimen were low-grade PanIN in both cases. SPACE was considered useful for preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in our study, however further study is needed to examine its diagnostic accuracy for early pancreatic cancer which does not appear as a mass in any imaging modality.

Surgical approaches to the superior mesenteric artery during minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) has recently been safely performed by experts, and various methods for resection have been reported. This review summarizes the literature describing surgical approaches for MIPD. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE) was conducted for studies reporting robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; the reference lists of review articles were searched. Of 444 articles yielded, 23 manuscripts describing the surgical approach to dissect around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), including hand-searched articles, were assessed. RESULTS: Various approaches to dissect around the SMA have been reported. These approaches were categorized according to the direction toward the SMA when initiating dissection around the SMA: anterior approach (two articles), posterior approach (four articles), right approach (16 articles), and left approach (three articles). Thus, many reports used the right approach. Most articles provided a technical description. Some articles showed the advantage of their method in a comparison study. However, these were single-center retrospective studies with a small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Various approaches for MIPD have been reported; however, few authors have reported the advantage of their methods compared to other methods. Further discussion is needed to clarify the appropriate surgical approach to the SMA during MIPD.

Precision vascular anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is increasingly performed worldwide; however, the surgical anatomy required to safely perform MIDP has not yet been fully considered. This review evaluated the literature concerning peripancreatic vascular anatomy, which is considered important to conduct safe MIDP. METHODS: A database search of PubMed and Ichushi (Japanese) was conducted. Qualified studies investigating the anatomical variations of peripancreatic vessels related to MIDP were evaluated using SIGN methodology. RESULTS: Of 701 articles yielded by our search strategy, 76 articles were assessed in this systematic review. The important vascular anatomy required to recognize MIDP included the pancreatic parenchymal coverage on the root and the running course of the splenic artery, branching patterns of the splenic artery, confluence positions of the left gastric vein and the inferior mesenteric vein, forms of pancreatic veins including the centro-inferior pancreatic vein, characteristics of the left renal vein, and collateral routes perfusing the spleen following Warshaw's technique. Very few articles evaluating the relationship between the anatomical variations and surgical outcomes of MIDP were found. CONCLUSIONS: The precise knowledge of peripancreatic vessels is important to adequately complete MIDP. More detailed anatomic analyses and descriptions will benefit surgeons and their patients who are facing these operations.

Surgical approaches for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) was initially performed for benign tumors, but recently its indications have steadily broadened to encompass other conditions including pancreatic malignancies. Thorough anatomical knowledge is mandatory for precise surgery in the era of minimally invasive surgery. However, expert consensus regarding anatomical landmarks to facilitate the safe performance of MIDP is still lacking. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using keywords to identify articles regarding the vascular anatomy and surgical approaches/techniques for MIDP. RESULTS: All of the systematic reviews revealed that MIDP was not associated with an increase in postoperative complications. Moreover, most showed that MIDP resulted in less blood loss than open surgery. Regarding surgical approaches for MIDP, a standardized stepwise procedure improved surgical outcomes, including blood loss, operative time, and major complications. There are two approaches to the splenic vessels, superior and inferior; however, no study has ever directly compared them with respect to clinical outcomes. The morphology of the splenic artery affects the difficulty of approaching the artery's root. To select an appropriate dissecting layer when performing posterior resection, thorough knowledge of the anatomy of the fascia, left renal vein/artery, and left adrenal gland is needed. CONCLUSIONS: In MIDP, a standardized approach and precise knowledge of anatomy facilitates safe surgery and has the advantage of a shorter learning curve. Anatomical features and landmarks are particularly important in cases of radical MIDP and splenic vessel preserving MIDP.

International Expert Consensus on Precision Anatomy for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy: PAM-HBP Surgery Project.

BACKGROUND: Surgical views with high resolution and magnification have enabled us to recognize the precise anatomical structures that can be used as landmarks during minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). This study aimed to validate the usefulness of anatomy-based approaches for MIDP before and during the Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (February 24, 2021). METHODS: Twenty-five international MIDP experts developed clinical questions regarding surgical anatomy and approaches for MIDP. Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. Online Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted the recommendations, with the goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations in front of the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting. RESULTS: Four clinical questions were addressed, resulting in 10 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 75% consensus among experts. CONCLUSIONS: The expert consensus on precision anatomy for MIDP has been presented as a set of recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinions. These recommendations should guide experts and trainees in performing safe MIDP and foster its appropriate dissemination worldwide.

A snapshot of the 2020 conception of anatomic liver resections and their applicability on minimally invasive liver surgery. A preparatory survey for the Expert Consensus Meeting on Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The main aim of this survey was to analyze how liver surgeons perform liver resections and to define their conception of anatomic procedures within the incorporation of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS). METHODS: The survey was distributed among liver surgeons. It mainly focused on personal experience on open and MILS, methods and landmarks, and experience on anatomic resections and Glissonean approach. RESULTS: A total of 445 valid answers from 54 countries was obtained. Surgeons performing MILS mainly have below 10 years of experience (81.8% of responders) and one third has never done complex MILS. New techniques, including indocyanine green demarcation are marginally used (<25%). More than 60% of surgeons do not make a full exposure of hepatic veins during MILS, mainly due to the risk of injury or not considering it to be of utility. Although 88% of responders agreed with the concept of anatomic resection as the "resection along the border/watersheds of each order division identified by the portal vein flow", only 55% of surgeons have ever performed MILS Glissonean approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Liver anatomy is not a static concept. Anatomic resections need training and precision. Standardization of complex anatomic resections by a minimally invasive approach should be encouraged.

International expert consensus on precision anatomy for minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: PAM-HBP surgery project.

BACKGROUND: The anatomical structure around the pancreatic head is very complex and it is important to understand its precise anatomy and corresponding anatomical approach to safely perform minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD). This consensus statement aimed to develop recommendations for elucidating the anatomy and surgical approaches to MIPD. METHODS: Studies identified via a comprehensive literature search were classified using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Delphi voting was conducted after experts had drafted recommendations, with a goal of obtaining >75% consensus. Experts discussed the revised recommendations with the validation committee and an international audience of 384 attendees. Finalized recommendations were made after a second round of online Delphi voting. RESULTS: Three clinical questions were addressed, providing six recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a consensus of 75%. Preoperatively evaluating the presence of anatomical variations and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) branching patterns was recommended. Moreover, it was recommended to fully understand the anatomical approach to SMA and intraoperatively confirm the SMA course based on each anatomical landmark before initiating dissection. CONCLUSIONS: MIPD experts suggest that surgical trainees perform resection based on precise anatomical landmarks for safe and reliable MIPD.

Expert Consensus Guidelines: How to safely perform minimally invasive anatomic liver resection.

BACKGROUND: The concept of minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (MIALR) is gaining popularity. However, specific technical skills need to be acquired to safely perform MIALR. The "Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (PAM-HBP Surgery Consensus)" was developed as a special program during the 32nd meeting of the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS). METHODS: Thirty-four international experts gathered online for the consensus. A Research Committee performed a comprehensive literature review, classifying studies according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network method. Based on the literature review and experts' opinions, tentative recommendations were drafted and circulated among experts using online Delphi Rounds. Finally, formulated recommendations were presented online in the Expert Consensus Meeting of the JSHBPS on February 23rd, 2021. The final recommendations were validated and finalized by the 2nd Delphi Round in May 2021. RESULTS: Seven clinical questions were selected, and 22 recommendations were formulated. All recommendations reached more than 85% consensus among experts at the final Delphi Round. CONCLUSIONS: The Expert Consensus Meeting for safely performing MIALR has presented a set of clinical guidelines based on available literature and experts' opinions. We expect these guidelines to have a favorable effect on the safe implementation and development of MIALR.

Precision anatomy for safe approach to pancreatoduodenectomy for both open and minimally invasive procedure: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) has recently gained popularity. Several international meetings focusing on the existing literature on MIPD were held; however, the precise surgical anatomy of the pancreas for the safe use of MIPD has not yet been fully discussed. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of available articles and to show the importance of identifying the anatomical variation in pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: In this review, we described variations in surgical anatomy related to MIPD. A systematic search of PubMed (MEDLINE) was conducted, and the references were identified manually. RESULTS: The search strategy yielded 272 articles, with 77 retained for analysis. The important anatomy to be considered during MIPD includes the aberrant right hepatic artery, first jejunal vein, first jejunal artery, and dorsal pancreatic artery. Celiac artery stenosis and a circumportal pancreas are also important to recognize. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that only certain anatomical variations are associated directly with perioperative outcomes and that identification of these particular variations is important for safe performance of MIPD.

Minimally invasive anatomic liver resection: Results of a survey of world experts.

BACKGROUND: Although the number of minimally invasive liver resections (MILRs) has been steadily increasing in many institutions, minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (MIALR) remains a complicated procedure that has not been standardized. We present the results of a survey among expert liver surgeons as a benchmark for standardizing MIALR. METHOD: We administered this survey to 34 expert liver surgeons who routinely perform MIALR. The survey contained questions on personal experience with liver resection, inflow/outflow control methods, and identification techniques of intersegmental/sectional planes (IPs). RESULTS: All 34 participants completed the survey; 24 experts (70%) had more than 11 years of experience with MILR, and over 80% of experts had performed over 100 open resections and MILRs each. Regarding the methods used for laparoscopic or robotic anatomic resection, the Glissonean approach (GA) was a more frequent procedure than the hilar approach (HA). Although hepatic veins were considered essential landmarks, the exposure methods varied. The top three techniques that the experts recommended for identifying IPs were creating a demarcation line, indocyanine green negative staining method, and intraoperative ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive anatomic liver resection remains a challenging procedure; however, a certain degree of consensus exists among expert liver surgeons.

The Tokyo 2020 terminology of liver anatomy and resections: Updates of the Brisbane 2000 system.

BACKGROUND: The Brisbane 2000 Terminology for Liver Anatomy and Resections, based on Couinaud's segments, did not address how to identify segmental borders and anatomic territories of less than one segment. Smaller anatomic resections including segmentectomies and subsegmentectomies, have not been well defined. The advent of minimally invasive liver resection has enhanced the possibilities of more precise resection due to a magnified view and reduced bleeding, and minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (MIALR) is becoming popular gradually. Therefore, there is a need for updating the Brisbane 2000 system, including anatomic segmentectomy or less. An online "Expert Consensus Meeting: Precision Anatomy for Minimally Invasive HBP Surgery (PAM-HBP Surgery Consensus)" was hosted on February 23, 2021. METHODS: The Steering Committee invited 34 international experts from around the world. The Expert Committee (EC) selected 12 questions and two future research topics in the terminology session. The EC created seven tentative definitions and five recommendations based on the experts' opinions and the literature review performed by the Research Committee. Two Delphi Rounds finalized those definitions and recommendations. RESULTS: This paper presents seven definitions and five recommendations regarding anatomic segmentectomy or less. In addition, two future research topics are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The PAM-HBP Surgery Consensus has presented the Tokyo 2020 Terminology for Liver Anatomy and Resections. The terminology has added definitions of liver anatomy and resections that were not defined in the Brisbane 2000 system.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the common bile duct associated with congenital bile duct dilatation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma is frequently observed in patients with congenital bile duct dilatation (CBDD). Most cholangiocarcinomas are adenocarcinomas. Other types, especially neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), are rare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the third reported case of an NEC of the common bile duct associated with CBDD and the first to receive adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease. CASE PRESENTATION: A 29-year-old woman presented with upper abdominal pain. Preoperative imaging indicated marked dilatation of the common bile duct and a tumor in the middle portion of the common bile duct. She was suspected of having distal cholangiocarcinoma associated with CBDD and underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pathological and immunohistological findings led to a final diagnosis of large-cell NEC (pT3aN1M0 pStageIIB). The postoperative course was uneventful, and she was administered cisplatin and irinotecan every 4 weeks (four cycles) as adjuvant chemotherapy. She has remained recurrence-free for 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: NEC might be a differential diagnosis in cases of cholangial tumor associated with congenital bile duct dilatation. This presentation is rare and valuable, and to establish better treatment for NEC, further reports are necessary.

Causative bacteria associated with a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula infection after distal pancreatectomy.

PURPOSE: Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (CR-POPF) occurring after distal pancreatectomy often cause intra-abdominal infections. We monitored the presence of bacterial contamination in the ascitic fluid after distal pancreatectomy to clarify the bacterial origin of intra-abdominal infections associated with CR-POPF. METHODS: In 176 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy, ascitic fluid bacterial cultures were performed on postoperative days (POD) 1-4 and when the drainage fluid became turbid. The association between postoperative ascitic bacterial contamination and CR-POPF incidence was investigated. RESULTS: CR-POPF occurred in 18 cases (10.2%). Among the patients with CR-POPF, bacterial contamination was detected in 0% on POD 1, in 38.9% on POD 4, and in 72.2% on the day (median, day 9.5) when the drainage fluid became turbid. A univariate analysis revealed a significant difference in ascitic bacterial contamination on POD 4 (p < 0.001) and amylase level on POD 3-4 (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed the amylase level and ascitic bacterial contamination on POD 4 to be independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In the CR-POPF group, ascitic bacterial contamination was not observed in the early postoperative stage, but the bacterial contamination rate increased after pancreatic juice leakage occurred. Therefore, CR-POPF-related infections in distal pancreatectomy may be caused by a retrograde infection of pancreatic juice.

Incidence of anastomotic stricture after hepaticojejunostomy with continuous sutures in patients who underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic hepatojejunostomy (HJ) with continuous sutures is commonly performed in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). This study aimed to investigate the long-term surgical outcomes of HJ in LPD. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 103 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy via laparoscopic HJ with continuous suturing using multifilament (n = 48) or monofilament-absorbable sutures (n = 47). RESULTS: During follow-up, anastomotic stricture of HJ was identified in 8 (7.8%) patients via balloon enteroscopy-assisted cholangiography. The median time from surgery to confirmation of stricture formation was 7.6 months (range 3.6-19.4). The incidence of HJ stricture was significantly higher in patients with a thin bile duct (diameter < 6.0 mm) than in those with a thick bile duct (diameter ≥ 6.0 mm) [7/27 (25.9%) vs. 1/76 (1.3%), respectively, p < 0.01]. Similarly, it was significantly higher in the monofilament group than in the multifilament group [7/54 (13.0%) vs. 1/49 (2.0%), respectively, p = 0.04]. In the monofilament suture group, 37.5% of patients with thin bile ducts developed stricture after HJ. A multivariate analysis revealed that a thin bile duct was an independent risk factor for HJ stricture (hazard ratio: 25.3, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Stricture after laparoscopic HJ using continuous sutures frequently occurs in patients with thin bile ducts, particularly when monofilament-absorbable suture is used.